If this is your first time reading this blog please do yourself a favor and start from Part 1 of this series. I only ask for your time and that you read all parts in it entirety and do so with an open mind. It is with a loving heart and spirit and an obligation to truth that I present this information.
I ended Part 4 of this series and left off with three comparisons. Please make sure that you are familiar with them as I will not be reviewing them in this blog. I will refer to them by their numbers throughout this blog and some information that I will present will not make sense without the comparisons.
When I originally started this series I stated in part 1 that one of my main reasons for writing this particular blog was because of the numerous questions I had been asked about “religion” and my personal beliefs. This blog is my attempt to answer those questions and address some other issues as stated in the title. This journey has been long and seems almost never ending but there is a light at the end of this tunnel.
I am aware that some of what I am going to write in this part many people reading may fail to understand. Our minds are only able to perceive that which our hearts truly follow. It is for this reason we find in 2 Thessalonians 2:11- “And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie.” In other words if you believe a lie long enough it becomes your truth. Not the truth but your truth. So again what determines the truth when it comes to “religion?” You do! The uniqueness of our species is free will and choice. The more knowledge you have regarding certain things the better your decisions. Now I hope to provide you with greater knowledge by taking another look at the comparisons made in Part 4.
According to the Bible the first city was built by Cain and named after his son Enoch. According to Sumerian history the very first city ever built was established by human beings under the care of the god Enki, and named Eridu. In comparison 1 I touched upon the lineage of Cain as it relates to the bible but failed to mention how on the other hand, the Sumerians appear to focus in greater detail upon the line of Cain, with the institution of the hereditary monarchy "descending from heaven" to Enki's city, the city of Eridu, named for Irad the grandson of Cain. Ironically, when it comes to stories, disputes specifically, that are recorded in the Bible and those that are recorded according to the Sumerians the victors are the exact opposites. For instance both the Bible and the Sumerian text “Emesh and Enten” have a Cain and Abel like story. However in the Emesh and Enten Cain is favored over Abel whereas according to the bible Abel is favored over Cain. In the myth Inanna and Enki the art of music and metal-working are always closely associated with Enki and specifically mentioned. In the Sumerian myth Enki Builds the E-Engurra Enki identifies himself as the lord of the abyss. In other Sumerian myths Enki identifies himself with the serpent, dragon etc. I said it in Part 3 and I am saying it again here “The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.” So now if Enki is “Satan” a.k.a “Ea” a.k.a “Oannes” a.ka. “Dagon” a.k.a “Zeus” a.k.a “Neptune” a.k.a “Poseidon” a.k.a “Ptah” etc... a.k.a the fallen angel “Haylel”, than who is Enlil? For the sake of time Enlil is “Beelzebub” a.k.a “Baalzebub” a.k.a “Baal” a.k.a “Seth/Set” a.k.a “Bel” a.k.a “Pir Rub” a.k.a “Baal Zebul” a.k.a “Satan” a.k.a “Cernunnos” etc... a.k.a the fallen angel “Bael.” Enki’s youngest son Ningizzida in Sumerian (a nephilum) was revered as Thoth in Egypt and Hermes in the West. Thoth is the ancient Egyptian Scribe. Hermes who is the Magician - the Alchemist also said to be Enoch (Cain’s son, who is not the same one who was translated with the Lord). The ancient Mystery School Teachings of Thoth were passed down to his Initiates who became the priests giving us the earliest form of Hermetics. Enki’s oldest son Marduk in Sumerian/Babylonian was revered as Ra in Egypt while Thoth becomes Quetzalcoatl in the Mesoamerican Civilization. Hopefully, you understand the importance of the references and these comparisons can be made for the other Sumerian gods which I will not do, due to time but encourage you to research for yourself to see further parallels between them, the gods of “mythology”, the fallen angels and the nephilum.
If you are still following me I’d like to reiterate something from earlier as I will spend the next few paragraphs on this statement alone to introduce the illuminati.
“.... but failed to mention how on the other hand, the Sumerians appear to focus in greater detail upon the line of Cain, with the institution of the hereditary monarchy "descending from heaven" to Enki's city, the city of Eridu, named for Irad the grandson of Cain.”
What this paragraph means is that in order for the Annunaki (Enki specifically) to rule
he (they) had to use humans to do so. This is why in mythology the rulers were said to
be direct descendants of the gods. This is also a direct reference to the seed of Satan
(as discussed in Part 4.) Remember how in Part 4 I suggested that Sumerians were the
children that he (Satan/Enki) created, along with offspring from the union of the
fallen angels and the daughters of man? While most people will attempt to discredit the
Bible because of parallel stories the focus of the blood lines are completely different.
The Sumerian text bloodline focuses on Cain while the Bible focuses on Seth in lieu of
his deceased brother Abel. For example in Part 2 I discussed the story of the great
deluge (Noah and the Ark in the Bible and Sumerian version Ziusudra). In the Bible we
find great emphasis placed on Noah for being perfect (genetically speaking), just,
upright: a man of integrity and walking with God -Genesis 6:9. Ziusudra, a king, on the
other hand is described as being pious. The definition of the word pious is devoutly
religious, making a hypocritical display of virtue, sincere but unlikely to be fulfilled etc...
Noah and Ziusudra are not the same individuals but one is a perversion of the other. However, the gods had to account for their bloodline after the deluge. Now I know you are wondering how his seed (the bloodline of Cain) could have survived after the flood but remember in Part 4 comparison 1 I discussed the children of Cain. I mentioned Cain had a daughter named Na’amah but did not mention that she married a man named Noah. They had three children Shem, Japheth, and Ham who along with their wives were also saved during the flood. In Genesis 9:25 we find Noah cursing Canaan, Ham’s son, for something that Ham has done while blessing Shem and Japheth. There is much debate regarding the true reason for this curse along with the details of the curse. The most interesting thing regarding this blog topic is that through the bloodline of Ham we are reintroduced to the Sumerian pantheon of the son of his eldest son (Cush), namely Nimrod.
Nimrod and Religion
Before I continue there are some things that you should know. Which ever story you choose to believe the Sumerian version of the deluge or the biblical version is personal. From this event it is said that the earth was re-populated- Genesis 9. Each son and his off-spring went off and inhabited a different part of land. Ham’s sons were: Cush, Mizraim, Put and Canaan. Mizraim off-spring became the Egyptians. No one is sure where Put went to live. And it is obvious who the Canaanites were. Cush lived in the "land of Shinar," which most scholars consider to be Sumer. There they developed the first civilization after the Flood. The sons of Shem -- the Semites -- were also mixed, to some extent, with the Sumerians. The first kingdom established after the Flood was Kish, and the name "Kish" appears often on Sumerian clay tablets. The early post-Flood Sumerian king lists (not found in the Bible) say that "kingship descended from heaven to Kish" after the Flood. (The Hebrew name "Cush" was much later moved to present-day Ethiopia as migrations took place from Mesopotamia to other places.) Could the city Kish have been named after Cush its founder and possibly first king?
"Cush was the father of Nimrod, who grew to be a mighty warrior on the earth. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; that is why it is said, "Like Nimrod, a mighty hunter before the LORD. " The centers of his kingdom were Babylon, Erech, Akkad and Calneh in Shinar. [Genesis 10:8-10]
“Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it was through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach! and that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers!”
Antiquities of the Jews 1 Chapter 4:2
Antiquities of the Jews 1 Chapter 4:2
The word Nimrod comes from the Hebrew verb marad meaning “rebel” and the name itself means “The Rebel.” Nimrod became a mighty ruler who was opposed to the God of Seth for sending a flood and destroying his forefathers. He was determined to get revenge and build a mighty kingdom in the process. Does that not sound familiar? While the above bible verse about Nimrod may seem like a compliment it is the exact opposite which is made clear by the following passage from the Antiquities of the Jews 1. According to the Torah he was a powerful trapper [of people's minds, turning them against G-d]. Nimrod further established a developed religio-politico state which was extremely binding on all who lived in it (except for the rulers, who were a law unto themselves). This system was to influence the Ancient Near East for over 3000 years. Other cultures which followed the Sumerian system were Akkad, Babylon, Assyria, and Persia, which became the basis of Greece and Rome's system of rule. And guess which system of rule we follow in the United States?
Nimrod was renown. Known to the Sumerians as Etana, the King of Kish. Nebrod/Ninus to the Greek. The Epics of Gilgamesh of ancient Babylon are believed to be none other than Nimrod. Notice the use of the adjective “mighty” in Genesis 10 three times.. This is the same adjective used in Genesis 6:4 “...the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” Like his forefathers Nimrod was said to be a direct descendant of the gods. His father was said to be either Ea or Bel. The only problem is that we know that Cush was his father. This is really not a problem. Remember we knew that Adam was Cain’s father yet kingship came through his line via Enki at Eridu. Here we have the same situation. Earlier in the blog I told you that Ea was another name for Enki and Bel was another name for Enlil. Babel was the original name for Babylon, however Kish is where kingship descended from heaven. Cush’s wife, Nimrod’s mother, Semiramis also becomes Nimrod’s wife. Nimrod died with no known children although Semiramis, propagated the evil doctrine of the survival of Nimrod as a spirit being. She claimed a full-grown evergreen tree sprang overnight from a dead tree stump, which symbolized the springing forth unto new life of the dead Nimrod. On each anniversary of his birth, she claimed, Nimrod would visit the evergreen tree and leave gifts upon it. December 25th was the birthday of Nimrod. This is the real origin of the Christmas tree.
Through her scheming and designing, Semiramis became the Babylonian "Queen of Heaven," (Sumerian Goddess Ishtar/Inanna) and Nimrod, under various names, became the "divine son of heaven." Through the generations, in this idolatrous worship, Nimrod became the false Messiah, son of Baal(another name for Enlil) the Sun-god. In this false Babylonish system, the original goddess-mother of Babylon was Semiramis who was called Rhea in the eastern countries. In her arms she held a son, who though a babe, was described as tall, strong, handsome and especially captivating to the women. In Ezekiel 8:14 he was called Tammuz. Amongst classical writers he was called Bacchus. To the Babylonians he was Ninus. What accounts for the fact that he is represented as a babe in arms and yet described as a great and mighty man is that he is known as the "Husband-Son". One of his titles was "Husband of the Mother", and in India where the two are known as Iswara and Isi, he (the husband) is represented as the babe at the breast of his own wife. The "Mother and Child" (Semiramis and Nimrod reborn), became chief objects of worship. This worship of "Mother and Child" spread over the world. The names varied in different countries and languages. In Egypt, it was Isis and Osiris. In Asia, Cybele and Deoius. In pagan Rome, Fortuna and Jupiterpuer. In India it was Isi and Iswara. Even in Greece, China, Japan, Tibet can be found the counterpart of the Madonna, long before the birth of Christ!
Modern new age movements of Kemetism would have you question your spiritual beliefs if you are a believer/follower of Christ and would have you led to believe that the birth of Yeshua (Christ) is plagiarized from the pyramids of Egypt. The truth is that the story is one that was schemed long ago in an attempt to have those who are true to the CREATOR question all their beliefs and his words. Remember, since the garden both Eve and Satan knew about the coming redeemer: “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel.” Genesis 3:15
Hopefully, I have not lost you but just in case here is a quick recap. The Sumerian epic of Creation is an account of the lineage of Cain. The bible focuses on Adam and Eve and the line of Seth in lieu of Abel, the brother that Cain murdered according to the bible. The God of the bible is not one of the same gods of the Sumerian Epic of Creation. The Bible does not deny the existence of multiple gods, however, the Bible maintains YHVH as the supreme God and Creator of all, who later becomes flesh as his son Yeshua, to die as the last sacrifice so that all may have the gift of immortality if only you believe and accept Yeshua as ruler of your life. In the Sumerian/Akkadian/Babylonian text (from which most other cultures derive their epics) are stories of multiple gods presenting themselves as extra terrestrials, building kingdoms and fighting for the right to be known as the supreme God until the next god rises up and challenges them for their position. Originally they dwelt amongst the people but then left and established a bloodline for kingship/governing powers. The established bloodline is part mortal and part immortal. Nimrod was of this bloodline and viewed as one of the greatest tyrants ever and was opposed to YHVH. His kingdom and systems became the archetype for much of the world systems of yesterday and today. Both texts speak of an end and a return of man’s "creator".
I want to continue onto the last part of this topic and conclude this series but I know that doing so would be an injustice to the material. I have learned that patience is a virtue and ask for yours. It is hoped that from reading this part I have given a little more evidence to support how these “intraterrestial” beings infiltrated earlier civilization, and in part 6 will suggest ways they continue today. Keeping the bloodline in tact while using the half-truth of attainment of “lost, hidden knowledge and secrets” to keep most deprived of the real truth they seek.
